Al-Shabab 0–0 Al-Najma SC
Expected and what happened
- Expected xG
- 2.0 – 0.7
- Actual xG
- 1.5 – 0.4
- Goals
- 0 – 0
Footybot made Al-Shabab favourites at 70%.
Al-Shabab deserved more from the draw, creating 1.5 xG to 0.4.
Best on the pitch by Footybot's score: Victor Braga, 62.4 in 90′.
Well above their usual level: Victor Braga +15.0, Marcelo Grohe +10.3, Unai Hernández +9.4.
Well below it: Yannick Carrasco −28.5.
Going in
Each side's last five results before this match.
Al-Shabab
| 17 Jan 2026 | L 2–3 | at Al-Nassr |
| 14 Jan 2026 | W 3–2 | v Neom SC |
| 9 Jan 2026 | L 0–2 | at Al-Taawoun |
| 3 Jan 2026 | L 0–2 | at Al-Fateh |
| 31 Dec 2025 | L 2–3 | v Al-Qadsiah |
Al-Najma SC
| 16 Jan 2026 | D 1–1 | v Al-Fateh |
| 12 Jan 2026 | L 2–3 | at Al-Hazem |
| 8 Jan 2026 | L 3–4 | v Al-Ettifaq |
| 2 Jan 2026 | D 2–2 | v Al-Khaleej |
| 29 Dec 2025 | L 0–1 | at Al-Taawoun |
Head to head
No earlier meeting in Footybot's data.
Al-Shabab
| Player | Min | Score | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Grohe | 90 | 55.9 | +10.3 |
| Wesley Hoedt | 90 | 50.1 | +7.5 |
| Unai Hernández | 90 | 49.3 | +9.4 |
| Mohammed Al Shwirekh | 90 | 47.2 | +1.9 |
| Basil Yousef Al-Sayyali | 83 | 46.6 | +0.8 |
| Josh Brownhill | 90 | 40.1 | −4.6 |
| Carlos Junior | 90 | 39.9 | −2.9 |
| Ali Makki | 13 | 37.0 | – |
| Saad Yaslam Balobaid | 90 | 36.4 | −5.7 |
| Hammam Al-Hammami | 90 | 33.6 | −3.3 |
| Mohammed Al-Thani | 90 | 23.6 | – |
| Yannick Carrasco | 90 | 23.1 | −28.5 |
Al-Najma SC
| Player | Min | Score | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Braga | 90 | 62.4 | +15.0 |
| Rakan Al-Tulayhi | 80 | 50.6 | +1.8 |
| Ali Jasim | 90 | 50.2 | +5.5 |
| Bilal Boutobba | 90 | 46.9 | +6.0 |
| Nasser Al Haleel | 83 | 45.8 | +3.3 |
| Vitor Vargas | 90 | 45.2 | +7.5 |
| Hisham Al-Dubais | 10 | 42.8 | – |
| David Tijanič | 90 | 42.2 | −3.1 |
| Lázaro | 80 | 40.3 | −4.2 |
| Samir Caetano | 90 | 40.2 | −4.4 |
| Deybi Flores | 90 | 39.5 | −3.6 |
| Abdullah Al-Hawsawi | 90 | 39.3 | +4.4 |
| Khalid Al-Shammari | 13 | 26.8 | – |
| Abdulelah Alshamary | 10 | 25.2 | – |