Wolverhampton 6–1 Shrewsbury Town
Expected and what happened
- Expected xG
- 1.8 – 0.8
- Actual xG
- 3.5 – 0.9
- Goals
- 6 – 1
Footybot made Wolverhampton favourites at 60%.
Wolverhampton won and made the better chances: 3.5 xG to 0.9.
Best on the pitch by Footybot's score: Jørgen Strand Larsen, 79.6 in 74′.
Well above their usual level: Jørgen Strand Larsen +36.1, Tom Anderson +21.8, Taylor Perry +10.7.
Well below it: David Møller Wolfe −20.1, João Gomes −16.8, Sam Johnstone −10.4.
Going in
Each side's last five results before this match.
Wolverhampton
| 7 Jan 2026 | D 1–1 | at Everton |
| 3 Jan 2026 | W 3–0 | v West Ham United |
| 30 Dec 2025 | D 1–1 | at Manchester United |
| 27 Dec 2025 | L 1–2 | at Liverpool FC |
| 20 Dec 2025 | L 0–2 | v Brentford |
Shrewsbury Town
| 6 Dec 2025 | D 1–1 | at Sutton United |
| 2 Nov 2025 | W 3–1 | at South Shields |
| 12 Aug 2025 | L 1–3 | at Grimsby Town |
Head to head
No earlier meeting in Footybot's data.
Wolverhampton
| Player | Min | Score | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tolu Arokodare | 16 | 100.0 | – |
| Rodrigo Gomes | 30 | 80.5 | – |
| Jørgen Strand Larsen | 74 | 79.6 | +36.1 |
| Jhon Arias | 84 | 55.4 | +6.7 |
| Jackson Tchatchoua | 60 | 51.8 | +7.9 |
| Mateus Mané | 29 | 49.3 | – |
| Santiago Bueno | 90 | 45.7 | −3.6 |
| Fer López | 16 | 44.2 | – |
| André | 90 | 42.9 | −9.0 |
| Hwang Hee-chan | 74 | 40.9 | −7.6 |
| Ladislav Krejčí | 90 | 40.6 | −8.0 |
| Sam Johnstone | 90 | 40.5 | −10.4 |
| Matt Doherty | 90 | 40.2 | −8.2 |
| João Gomes | 61 | 35.2 | −16.8 |
| David Møller Wolfe | 90 | 26.6 | −20.1 |
| Pedro Lima | 9 | 20.8 | – |
Shrewsbury Town
| Player | Min | Score | vs usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Marquis | 90 | 69.9 | – |
| Tom Anderson | 90 | 52.1 | +21.8 |
| Luca Hoole | 90 | 50.4 | – |
| Taylor Perry | 90 | 48.0 | +10.7 |
| Tommy McDermott | 90 | 47.0 | – |
| William Boyle | 90 | 45.4 | – |
| Ismeal Kabia | 90 | 44.6 | – |
| Jack Loughran | 15 | 43.9 | – |
| Iwan Morgan | 75 | 40.0 | – |
| Josh Ruffels | 75 | 39.7 | – |
| Trey Samuel Ogunsuyi | 15 | 38.1 | – |